Case 2404460/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Mulcare v Nationwide Management Services Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2404460/2023
- Decision date
- 5 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Mulcare
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of the claim. By letter dated 10 November 2023, it gave Mr M Mulcare an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal's order made following the preliminary hearing on 28 June 2023 and/or because the claim had not been actively pursued. Mr Mulcare did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Shotter struck out the claim. No remedy was awarded, and the judgment records that it was sent to the parties on 5 January 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim after a letter dated 10 November 2023 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about non-compliance with an order made after the preliminary hearing on 28 June 2023 and/or failure to actively pursue the claim. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.