Case 2404483/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Hennedy v Neales Waste Management Limited and 1 other — 2018
- Case reference
- 2404483/2018
- Decision date
- 31 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sherratt REPRESENTATION
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr B Hennedy
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing, the Tribunal recorded that there had been a transfer of an undertaking from Neales Waste Management Limited to Lancashire County Council on 1 March 2018.
The Tribunal held that all liabilities in respect of the claimant's claim originally brought against Neales Waste Management Limited transferred to Lancashire County Council. Neales Waste Management Limited was removed as a party, leaving Lancashire County Council as the only respondent to the claimant's claims.
The judgment did not determine the merits of the claimant's underlying claims and made no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Preliminary hearing judgment only determined that liabilities in respect of the claimant's claim transferred from the first respondent to the second respondent following a transfer of undertaking on 1 March 2018; it did not determine the substantive merits of the underlying claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.