Case 2404545/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Dingwall v Ms S Roe — 2026
- Case reference
- 2404545/2025
- Decision date
- 2 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Dingwall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Miss T Dingwall was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,350 from Ms S Roe. Employment Judge Phil Allen issued the judgment on 2 July 2026 under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024.
The accompanying interest notice specifies a rate of 8% per annum and states that no interest is payable if the award is paid in full within 14 days of the relevant decision day. No interest amount is calculated. The notice gives a relevant decision day of 4 August 2026, which differs from the dispatch date of 4 July 2026 recorded on the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment records that it was sent to the parties on 4 July 2026, but the interest notice specifies a relevant decision day of 4 August 2026 and a calculation day of 5 August 2026. No monetary interest amount is stated. | Upheld | — | £4,350 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,350
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024, Rule 22
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.