Case 2404570/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Eyles v Hopworks Brew Co Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2404570/2024
- Decision date
- 14 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson Representatives
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Eyles
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Anderson, sitting alone at Manchester via CVP on 25 April 2025, heard the claimant Mr Eyles in person against Hopworks Brew Co Limited, which had not entered a response and was represented at the hearing by its director Mr Leyland. The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim of unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,687.35, and upheld his claim of wrongful dismissal with damages of £538.00, noting that the recoupment regulations did not apply.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide a payslip contrary to s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996; that claim was well founded but no separate compensation was awarded. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to provide a statement of terms and conditions of employment and awarded two weeks' pay of £1,076.00 under s.38 Employment Act 2002.
All sums were calculated on a gross basis. The judgment records that the sums set out are the outstanding amounts after giving credit for a net sum of £2,308 received by the claimant on the day of the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the claim well founded and ordered payment of £1,687.35 (gross). | Upheld | — | £1,687 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Damages of £538.00 ordered; recoupment regulations do not apply. | Upheld | — | £538 |
| Other | Failure to provide a payslip under s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996; well founded but no separate compensation awarded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide a statement of terms and conditions of employment; award of two weeks' pay (£1,076.00) under s.38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,076 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £993
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.