Case 2404572/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Froggatt v Barsan Global Logistics Limited and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 2404572/2024
- Decision date
- 30 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J Froggatt
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Froggatt withdrew all claims against My Recruit Limited on the first day of the hearing at Manchester, which took place on 28, 29 and 30 July 2026. The tribunal dismissed those claims on withdrawal.
The claims against Barsan Global Logistics failed in their entirety and were dismissed. The tribunal confirmed that all claims in the case were dismissed. The written judgment does not identify the individual claim types or set out the substantive reasons, which were given orally at the hearing. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify individual claim types. This entry records the collective outcome against My Recruit Limited: all claims were dismissed on withdrawal after the claimant withdrew them on the first day of the hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment does not identify individual claim types. This entry records the collective outcome against Barsan Global Logistics: all claims failed in their entirety and were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.