Case 2404574/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Butler v Bolton Textiles (Group) Limited (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2404574/2019
- Decision date
- 19 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Butler
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case remotely in Manchester on 25-26 February 2021 before Judge Brian Doyle. Mr A Butler was represented by counsel and Bolton Textiles (Group) Ltd was represented by its operations manager.
The published judgment records only that the claimant's claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. The written record does not break the dismissal down by individual head of claim.
The decision was dated 26 February 2021 and sent to the parties on 19 March 2021. The record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The published one-page judgment only states that the claimant's claim was not well-founded and dismissed; this head is taken from the GOV.UK case category listing and is not broken out separately in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The published one-page judgment only states that the claimant's claim was not well-founded and dismissed; this head is taken from the GOV.UK case category listing and is not broken out separately in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The published one-page judgment only states that the claimant's claim was not well-founded and dismissed; this head is taken from the GOV.UK case category listing and is not broken out separately in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The published one-page judgment only states that the claimant's claim was not well-founded and dismissed; this head is taken from the GOV.UK case category listing and is not broken out separately in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.