Case 2404585/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Easter v Transform Care Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2404585/2019
- Decision date
- 15 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Easter
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short procedural judgment in case numbers 2404585/2019 and 2405710/2019. Employment Judge Phil Allen recorded that the Tribunal had written to the respondent by letter dated 15 February 2022 giving it an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why its responses should not be struck out, because it had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 6 December 2021 and/or had not been actively pursued.
The respondent did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the respondent's responses. The judgment does not determine the underlying merits of the claimant's substantive complaints.
The Tribunal stated that the respondent would remain entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions, but would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. The claimant was told to ensure the case was prepared for hearing on the dates listed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine a substantive employment claim. It records that the respondent's responses in case numbers 2404585/2019 and 2405710/2019 were struck out after the respondent failed to make representations or request a hearing following the Tribunal's letter dated 15 February 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.