Case 2404604/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Taheri v Car Time Motor Company UK Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2404604/2019
- Decision date
- 13 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hoey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Taheri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hoey made a deposit order on 12 November 2019, sent to the parties on 13 November 2019, requiring Mr D Taheri to pay £750 by 25 November 2019 as a condition of proceeding with his claim. The order stated that if the payment was not made, the claim would be dismissed without further order.
The reasons record that an earlier order made on 17 September 2019 had not been followed. Mr Taheri said the order was an attempt to violate his human rights. The judgment did not determine the substantive claim on its merits and instead warned that the claim would be dismissed if the deposit was not paid.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Deposit order only. The tribunal ordered the claimant to pay a deposit of £750 by 25 November 2019 as a condition of proceeding with the claim, and stated that if payment was not made the claim would be dismissed without further order. The underlying claim was not decided on its merits in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.