Case 2404611/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Johnston Mrs J Healey v Saturn Trading Limited (in Liquidation) and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2404611/2019
- Decision date
- 9 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss K Johnston Mrs J Healey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the claimants' claims pursuant to rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the cases were not being actively pursued.
Neither claimant attended when the case was called. Notices had been sent to both claimants, neither had informed the Tribunal that they were unable to attend, no reason had been given for their failure to attend, and no communication had been received from either claimant.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim type follows the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself dismisses the claimants' claims without setting out the underlying allegations separately. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim type follows the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself dismisses the claimants' claims without setting out the underlying allegations separately. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Claim type follows the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself dismisses the claimants' claims without setting out the underlying allegations separately. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.