Case 2404615/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Hodgkiss v Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 2404615/2024
- Decision date
- 28 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B Hodgkiss
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Phil Allen sitting alone on 13 February 2025. The judgment determined limitation and jurisdiction issues only. Mrs B Hodgkiss brought an unfair dismissal claim and disability discrimination complaints against Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim because it had not been presented within the applicable time limit. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time, and the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
The tribunal also dealt with the disability discrimination complaints. One complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments, described in the judgment as the allegation that following a report in March 2023 the claimant should not have been required to work on the furthest wards or on reception, was held to be out of time. The tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit for that complaint, so it was dismissed.
The tribunal found that the claimant's other complaints of breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments, together with her complaint of discrimination arising from disability, were also presented outside the primary time limit. However, it decided that it was just and equitable to extend time for those claims, and they were therefore allowed to proceed. No substantive merits findings or monetary award were made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the Employment Tribunal held the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | This was the complaint that the respondent breached the duty to make reasonable adjustments following the March 2023 report, until late 2023, because the claimant said she should not have been required to work on the furthest wards or on reception. The tribunal held it was not presented in time and it was not just and equitable to extend the limit. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held that the claimant's other complaints of breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments, and her complaint of discrimination arising from disability, were out of time but that it was just and equitable to extend the time limit, so those complaints were allowed to proceed. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.