Case 2404622/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M German v Lostock Lawn Care And Landscapers Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2404622/2019
- Decision date
- 21 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M German
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that neither party attended the hearing listed for 13 January 2020. By letter dated 13 January 2020, the tribunal notified the parties of that position and gave the claimant an opportunity to respond and to explain why the claim should continue.
The claimant did not make any representations and had no contact with the tribunal after that letter. On that basis, Employment Judge Leach struck out the claim under Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
The judgment does not decide any substantive employment claim and records no remedy, liability finding, or award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type in the reasons; it records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.