Case 2404624/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L McParland v A & S Petroleum Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2404624/2022
- Decision date
- 18 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L McParland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. On that basis, the tribunal made a decision on the papers without a contested hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered A & S Petroleum Ltd to pay Mr L McParland £1,069. No separate breakdown of the award is given in the judgment.
The separate interest notice states that interest may become payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sum is not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day, which was 18 October 2022. The notice records the calculation day as 19 October 2022 and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum, but it does not set out any quantified interest award in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the claim was determined under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £1,069 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,069
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.