Case 2404634/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Travill v Leyland Park Ltd T/A Withy Arms Leyland (In Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2404634/2019
- Decision date
- 6 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Travill
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short procedural judgment in which Employment Judge Dunlop recorded that the respondent, Leyland Park Ltd T/A Withy Arms Leyland (In Liquidation), had been given an opportunity by letter dated 13 February 2020 to make written representations or request a hearing as to why its response should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The respondent did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the response. The judgment states that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any future hearings and decisions, but may only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The respondent's response was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the respondent did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 13 February 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.