Case 2404661/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Howard v Wellington Healthcare (Arden) Ltd t/a Bloomcare — 2023
- Case reference
- 2404661/2022
- Decision date
- 21 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Howard
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short-form strike-out judgment in which Employment Judge KM Ross recorded that the claim was struck out. The Tribunal had written to the claimant on 26 January 2023, giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it was not being actively pursued and that the claimant had failed to comply with Tribunal orders sent on 30 August 2022 and 24 October 2022.
The claimant did not respond. As a result, the Tribunal struck out the claim and stated that the hearing listed for 21, 22 and 23 June 2023 would not take place. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying dispute and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The short-form judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. The Tribunal struck out the claim because it was not being actively pursued and because the claimant failed to comply with orders in letters dated 30 August 2022 and 24 October 2022; the claimant did not respond to the Tribunal's letter dated 26 January 2023 inviting representations or a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.