Case 2404662/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Constance Francis v Izakaya Staff Limited t/a Dive Bar & Grill — 2023
- Case reference
- 2404662/2023
- Decision date
- 27 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Constance Francis
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the case under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time. On that basis, the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made of the claim without a response from the respondent.
The substantive finding was that Izakaya Staff Limited t/a Dive Bar & Grill had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss Constance Francis's wages. The tribunal therefore upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim and ordered the respondent to pay £691.92.
The written judgment was followed by an interest notice stating the relevant decision day as 27 July 2023, the calculation day as 28 July 2023, and the stipulated rate of interest as 8% per annum. The judgment itself did not set out any separate interest sum within the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £691.92. | Upheld | — | £692 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £692
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.