Case 2404672/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Grosicki v Damaros (MCR) Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2404672/2024
- Decision date
- 16 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Grosicki
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Cookson sat at Manchester on 15 May 2025. Mrs A Grosicki appeared in person, accompanied by her husband, and Damaros (MCR) Limited was represented by its director, Dr S Jajoo. The written record is a short oral-judgment record and sets out the tribunal's dispositive findings only.
The tribunal upheld the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. It found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction in the period 6 June 2024 to 16 June 2024 and ordered payment of the equivalent of £1,022.73 net, which the judge calculated as £1,249.65 gross if the claimant was to be responsible for tax or National Insurance.
The tribunal also found that, when proceedings began, the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars. It found no exceptional circumstances that would make an award of two weeks' gross pay unjust or inequitable, but it did not consider it just and equitable to award four weeks' gross pay. Under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, the respondent was ordered to pay £1,400.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in the period 6 June 2024 to 16 June 2024 and ordered the respondent to pay the equivalent of £1,022.73 net, which it calculated as £1,249.65 gross if the claimant was responsible for tax or National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,023 |
| Breach of contract | When proceedings began the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars. The tribunal found no exceptional circumstances making an award of two weeks' gross pay unjust or inequitable, but did not consider it just and equitable to award four weeks' gross pay; it ordered £1,400 under section 38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,423
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.