Case 2404676/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Jones v The Perfect Group (Northwest) Limited (in compulsory liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2404676/2022
- Decision date
- 13 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out Mr J Jones's claim against The Perfect Group (Northwest) Limited (in compulsory liquidation). The tribunal recorded that the respondent company was in compulsory liquidation and that the permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
On 24 November 2023 the tribunal gave the claimant until the end of January 2024 to provide evidence that he had obtained, or asked for, the permission of the winding up court to continue the tribunal proceedings. The claimant was warned that if he did not do so, the claim would be struck out as not actively pursued.
The claimant did not reply to that letter and did not provide the requested evidence. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim as not having been actively pursued. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not restate the substantive cause of action; it records that the claim was struck out because the respondent was in compulsory liquidation, permission of the winding up court had not been obtained, and the claimant did not provide the requested evidence of having sought or obtained that permission. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.