Case 2404693/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Lewis v Tesco Stores Limited HELD AT: Manchester — 2024
- Case reference
- 2404693/2022
- Decision date
- 13 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Lewis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr N Lewis brought claims against Tesco Stores Limited for unfair dismissal and for unauthorised deductions from wages in relation to holiday pay. The case was heard at Manchester before Employment Judge Slater on 28 February to 1 March 2024, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The tribunal dismissed both complaints. It recorded that the unfair dismissal complaint was not well founded, and that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages in relation to holiday pay was also not well founded. The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the complaint was 'not well founded'. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages in relation to holiday pay was found 'not well founded'. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.