Case 2404710/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) NASUWT Trade Union (2) Mr S Goodison (3) Ms J Rushworth (4) Ms B Moorhouse v Heathland School Limited in Administration) and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2404710/2022
- Decision date
- 29 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) NASUWT Trade Union (2) Mr S Goodison (3) Ms J Rushworth (4) Ms B Moorhouse
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, proceeding under rule 21 with no response presented, found that the first respondent had failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. NASUWT was the recognised trade union for professional employees, and the tribunal found that it was not consulted about the proposed redundancies or about measures connected with those dismissals. The tribunal accepted that the first respondent appointed administrators and that relevant employees were dismissed by reason of redundancy on or around 1 March 2022, with 44 employees dismissed at the establishment on or around the same date.
Under section 189 of the 1992 Act, the tribunal made a protective award for each employee for whom NASUWT was recognised, set at the maximum protected period of 90 days' pay beginning on 1 March 2022. The judgment also records that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 apply, so the respondent must provide the prescribed employee details to the Secretary of State and payment under the protective award is subject to the recoupment process.
The individual claimants' redundancy payment claims were not pursued: their representative confirmed on 28 February 2023 that they were not claiming redundancy payments and that the box had been ticked in error. The judgment also states that no claim against Grant Thornton UK LLP had been identified or pursued and that the claims against the second respondent were dismissed. The tribunal noted that the protective award itself was not financially quantified in the judgment and that any dispute about payment would be dealt with separately under section 192 of the 1992 Act.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal found that NASUWT was the recognised trade union for professional employees and that the first respondent failed to consult it about proposals to dismiss, or measures connected with the dismissal of, 20 or more employees. It found that around 44 employees were dismissed on or around 1 March 2022. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | On 28 February 2023 the claimants' representative confirmed that the individual claimants were not claiming a redundancy payment and that the ticked box was an error. The judgment records the redundancy payment claims as dismissed on withdrawal by the individual claimants. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that no claim against the second respondent, Grant Thornton UK LLP, had been identified or pursued, and that the claims against the second respondent were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Rule 21
- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.189 TULRCA 1992
- s.192 TULRCA 1992
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.