Case 2404722/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Gallagher v Eco Providers Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2404722/2024
- Decision date
- 5 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Gallagher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal record identifies Mr G Gallagher as the claimant and Eco Providers Limited as the respondent. The hearing was listed at Manchester on 3 December 2024 before Employment Judge Batten sitting alone, with no attendance for either party.
The judgment records that the claimant had not appeared by 2.45pm on the day of the hearing, which had been listed to commence at 2.15pm. In the absence of any explanation for that non-appearance, the tribunal exercised its powers under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim. The judgment does not record any merits findings, liability findings, or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant did not attend by 2.45pm for a hearing listed to start at 2.15pm and gave no explanation for non-appearance. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.