Mrs H Hamad v Ideal Training Limited — 2022

Case reference: 2404768/2022
Decision date: 21 September 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Phil Allen

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs H Hamad

Respondent

Ideal Training Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal determined the matter under Rule 21 and found that Ideal Training Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs H Hamad's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,177.80.

The award comprised three deductions identified in the judgment: £392.60 from November 2021 pay, £892.60 from December 2021 pay, and £892.60 from January 2022 pay. The listed hearing on 27 September 2022 was cancelled. The judgment itself did not make a separate award of interest or any other remedy; the accompanying notice explained the standard statutory interest regime only.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,177.80, made up of £392.60 deducted from November 2021 pay, £892.60 from December 2021 pay, and £892.60 from January 2022 pay.	Upheld	—	£2,178

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £2,178; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.