Case 2404775/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr CB Ayecabe v C.I.O Security Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2404775/2019
- Decision date
- 7 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter Members
- Venue
- Liverpool
- Panel members
- Mr G Pennie, Ms JM Stewart
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr CB Ayecabe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Liverpool on 5 November 2019 before Employment Judge Shotter, sitting with members Mr G Pennie and Ms JM Stewart. The claimant, Mr CB Ayecabe, and the respondent, C.I.O Security Limited, were both noted as not in attendance.
The tribunal’s judgment is brief and records only that all claims were dismissed. The text does not separate the dismissal of the breach of contract claim from the unfair dismissal claim, and it does not give reasons for the decision.
No remedy was awarded or recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed, but it does not set out separate reasons or a separate outcome for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed, but it does not set out separate reasons or a separate outcome for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.