Case 2404776/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Ntambi v Nova Payroll Management Services Ltd T/A Pin Point Recruitment — 2019
- Case reference
- 2404776/2019
- Decision date
- 13 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Ntambi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 31 July 2019 before Employment Judge Buzzard sitting alone, Mr M Ntambi succeeded in his claim against Nova Payroll Management Services Ltd t/a Pin Point Recruitment. The tribunal found that Nova breached the contract of employment by failing to pay accrued but untaken holiday on termination.
The tribunal ordered Nova to pay £1,578.26. The written judgment states that this figure represented 260.5 hours' pay at an hourly rate of £8.26, less £572.73 already paid to the claimant. The judgment also reminded the claimant that the compensation may be taxable and should be declared to HMRC as appropriate.
The claimant's holiday pay claims against Temps Ltd and Nick Pimblott were dismissed. The tribunal said that neither Temps Ltd nor Nick Pimblott was the claimant's employer, which was the reason those claims failed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that Nova Payroll Management Services Ltd t/a Pin Point Recruitment breached the claimant's contract by failing to pay accrued but untaken holiday on termination. It ordered payment of £1,578.26, described as 260.5 hours pay at £8.26 per hour less £572.73 already paid. | Upheld | — | £1,578 |
| Holiday pay | The claims against Temps Ltd and Nick Pimblott in relation to unpaid holiday pay were dismissed because the tribunal found that neither was the claimant's employer. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,578
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,578
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.