Case 2404784/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Bradbury v Babylon Retro Bar — 2022
- Case reference
- 2404784/2022
- Decision date
- 7 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Bradbury
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 7 September 2022, the tribunal gave Mr D Bradbury an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that he failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 12, 13 and 14 December 2022 was cancelled. The judgment records no substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claims and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; the judgment does not contain any substantive findings on the discrimination allegation. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; the judgment does not contain any substantive findings on the dismissal claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; the judgment does not contain any substantive findings on the wages claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.