Case 2404791/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Climo v Northern Property Direct Limited and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2404791/2019
- Decision date
- 22 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss A Climo
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 7 August 2019 before Employment Judge Robinson sitting alone, the tribunal gave an oral judgment and later recorded it in writing. The tribunal held that the first respondent, Northern Property Direct Limited, was liable to the claimant, Miss A Climo, for redundancy pay, breach of contract and unlawful deduction of wages.
The tribunal ordered payment of £2,481.41 by way of redundancy payment, £2,871 as notice pay, and £261 as holiday pay. These sums made a total award of £5,613.41 due to the claimant from the first respondent. The written record states that no written reasons would be provided unless requested, so the judgment contains no further findings or legal analysis beyond the outcome and the monetary orders.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,481 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this element as notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,871 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this element as holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £261 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,613
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.