Case 2404808/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Cristian Paul Iriarte Valdivia v Italian Catering Concept Ltd T/A Don Giovanni — 2022
- Case reference
- 2404808/2022
- Decision date
- 19 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Cristian Paul Iriarte Valdivia
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response and did not attend the hearing, so Tribunal Judge Holt proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The claimant gave evidence by CVP. The documents before the tribunal included the claimant's contract of employment, which described him as a head chef on £40,000 per year, equivalent to £769.23 gross per week, and the tribunal accepted that he was expected to work five days a week and was entitled to 28 days' paid holiday a year.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that he worked for the respondent from 24 May 2021 to 28 March 2022 and often worked extra hours. It found that he was not paid for his final week and that, over just over 10 months, he had taken only four days' holiday. On the tribunal's calculations, that left him owed 19 days' holiday, equivalent to 3.8 weeks at his net weekly pay of £559.23, plus one week's pay.
The tribunal calculated that the claimant's entitlement on that basis was £2,684.30 net, before deducting £513 the claimant said he had been paid after leaving. That reduced the calculated amount to £2,171.30. However, the tribunal noted that the claim form had been under-calculated and that the claimant did not seek to amend it at the hearing. It therefore awarded the sum claimed, £1,680 net, for unauthorised deductions from wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 decision on the respondent's non-response. The tribunal treated the claim as one for unauthorised deductions from wages, including unpaid holiday pay and one unpaid final week, and awarded the net sum claimed without splitting the award between heads of loss. | Upheld | — | £1,680 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,680
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 21(2) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.27 ERA 1996
- s.230 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.