Case 2404870/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Newey v Formby Models and Hobbies Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2404870/2024
- Decision date
- 26 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Newey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent did not present a response. The claimant, Mr S Newey, worked as a workshop repair and sales assistant for Formby Models and Hobbies Ltd from 10 June 1988 to 10 May 2024, working 16 hours per week over two days at £9.25 per hour. He had consented to be laid off from October 2022 until the business improved, and on 23 May 2024 he was told that the respondent had ceased trading on 10 May 2024.
The tribunal found that six weeks' wages from September to October 2022 had not been paid before the respondent ceased trading, and held that the claim for outstanding wages was well founded. It also found that the claimant's employment ended with immediate effect on 10 May 2024, that he was entitled to 12 weeks' notice under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and that notice pay of £2,196.48 remained unpaid. A separate claim for accrued holiday pay succeeded because, on termination, the claimant had accrued 10 days' annual leave, producing a holiday pay award of £915.20 under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
On redundancy, the tribunal found that the claimant was 70 years old and had worked for the respondent for 35 complete years. Applying section 164 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and the cap in section 162(3) limiting the calculation to the most recent 20 years, it awarded a redundancy payment calculated at one and a half weeks' pay for each of those 20 years, producing £5,491.20. The judgment also included the standard notice on interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that the relevant decision day was 26 November 2024 and the stipulated rate was 8% per annum, but no separate interest amount was assessed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Outstanding wages for six weeks in September-October 2022, awarded under regulation 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994. | Upheld | — | £912 |
| Breach of contract | Statutory notice pay under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; the tribunal found the claimant was entitled to 12 weeks' notice and immediate termination on 10 May 2024 meant the notice pay was unpaid. | Upheld | — | £2,196 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued holiday pay under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998; the tribunal found 10 days' annual leave had accrued at termination. | Upheld | — | £915 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment under section 164 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; the claimant was aged 70 and had 35 complete years' service, but section 162(3) limited the calculation to the most recent 20 years. | Upheld | — | £5,491 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,515
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- regulation 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 164 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 162 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 162(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.