Case 2404883/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Panton v Sterling Construction And Renewables Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2404883/2024
- Decision date
- 7 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Panton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the case under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024 because the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time. On that basis, it considered the claim of unauthorised deductions from wages and found it well-founded.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered Sterling Construction and Renewables Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) to pay Mr C Panton £6,796.24.
The award was broken down as £5,796.24 net for unpaid wages for April 2024 and May 2024, plus £1,000 gross for unpaid bonus. The judgment noted that the award was part gross and part net, and that the claimant would be responsible for any tax liabilities arising from the gross element if tax was not deducted at source.
A separate notice explained the tribunal's interest regime under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, including that interest becomes payable if the award is not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day, but the judgment itself did not quantify any interest sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the tribunal determined the claim under Rule 22. The unlawful deductions comprised unpaid wages for April 2024 and May 2024 of £5,796.24 net and an unpaid bonus of £1,000 gross. The award was described as part gross and part net, with any tax liability on the gross element to be the claimant's responsibility if tax is not deducted at source. | Upheld | — | £6,796 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,796
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, Article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.