Case 2404919/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Wilson v Tiger Curry House Ltd t/a Purple Rooms Hotel — 2019
- Case reference
- 2404919/2019
- Decision date
- 29 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Wilson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment is procedural only. The Employment Tribunal struck out the respondent's response because the respondent did not attend the Preliminary Hearing on 19 September 2019 and had not informed the Tribunal that it was unable to do so. The Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity by letter dated 19 September 2019 to make representations or request a hearing as to why the response should not be struck out.
The respondent did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, explaining why the response should not be struck out. On that basis, Employment Judge Slater ordered that the response be struck out.
The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the claimant's underlying complaints and does not record any remedy award. It states only that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal, but may participate in any hearing only to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine the underlying employment claims on their merits. It records only that the respondent's response was struck out after the respondent failed to attend the Preliminary Hearing and failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.