Case 2404938/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Taylor v Life Schools Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) and Secretary of State for Department of Business and Trade — 2026
- Case reference
- 2404938/2024
- Decision date
- 9 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Taylor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A Taylor claimed a protective award in respect of an alleged breach of the collective consultation requirements under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The first respondent, Life Schools Limited, was in creditors voluntary liquidation and did not present a response; the second respondent, the Secretary of State for Department of Business and Trade, was an interested party and did not support or resist the claim. The Tribunal issued judgment under Rule 22 after considering the file and hearing evidence from the claimant and Mrs Quilty.
The Tribunal found that the first respondent employed over 20 employees where the claimant worked, that no trade union was recognised for collective bargaining, consultation or negotiation at the site, and that no employee representatives had been elected or appointed for consultation within section 188A of the 1992 Act. Employees were told on 24 July 2024 that the first respondent was closing down and that they were all being made redundant with immediate effect.
The Tribunal found that there was no proper warning or notice given to, or consultation with, the workforce. It held that the first respondent was in breach of the duty under section 188 of the 1992 Act and that the claimant's complaint under section 189 was well-founded.
The Tribunal made a protective award under section 189 in favour of the claimant for the maximum protected period of 90 days commencing on 24 July 2024. It ordered the first respondent to pay the claimant a payment equivalent to remuneration for that period, subject to the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996. No monetary figure was stated in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with collective consultation requirements under section 188. The judgment awarded 90 days' remuneration but did not state a monetary amount. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Rule 22 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024
- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.