Case 2404943/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Redikin v Automatic Fire Suppression Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2404943/2019
- Decision date
- 21 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Warren Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Redikin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend the hearing and no response was received, so Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules applied. The tribunal proceeded on the claimant's evidence and made findings on the financial claims before it.
It found that there had been an unlawful deduction from wages in March 2019 and ordered the respondent to pay £4,166 gross. It also found that the claimant had accrued 10 days of untaken and unpaid leave, for which it awarded £1,923 compensation.
On the contractual claims, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to give the claimant 2 months' notice or pay in lieu. It accepted that the claimant mitigated his loss and was out of work for 2 weeks, and awarded £1,923. It further found that pension contributions at 3% of the claimant's gross salary of £50,000 had not been paid for 9 months, awarding £1,125.
The total award due and payable to the claimant was £9,137. The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for ensuring that statutory payments are met as required.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award stated as gross for an unlawful deduction from wages in March 2019. | Upheld | — | £4,166 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found 10 days of untaken and unpaid leave and awarded compensation. | Upheld | — | £1,923 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent failed to give 2 months' notice or pay in lieu; the claimant mitigated his loss and was out of work for 2 weeks. | Upheld | — | £1,923 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent failed to pay pension contributions at 3% of gross salary of £50,000 for 9 months. | Upheld | — | £1,125 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,137
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.