Case 2404949/2024 · Employment Tribunal
X v Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 2404949/2024
- Decision date
- 20 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
X
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn the only substantive finding recorded in the extracted judgment, the tribunal held that during the relevant period from June 2023 to March 2024 the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010. The supplied text does not set out any further liability analysis, findings on discrimination allegations, or any monetary remedy.
The tribunal also made a Rule 49(3)(b) anonymity order, directing that the claimant be anonymised and referred to as X. The record states that oral reasons were given and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so no additional reasoning appears in the text provided here.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The extracted judgment records only that, in the relevant period June 2023 to March 2024, the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010. No further liability findings or remedy award appear in the supplied text. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Rule 49(3)(b) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.