Case 2404960/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Witkowska v Central Recruitment Services — 2019
- Case reference
- 2404960/2019
- Decision date
- 4 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Witkowska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 21 September 2019 the Tribunal wrote to Miss M Witkowska giving her an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The reason given was that she had not replied to tribunal letters dated 23 August 2019 and 6 September 2019 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations explaining why the claim should not be struck out, and did not request a hearing. In those circumstances, Regional Employment Judge Parkin ordered that the claim be struck out.
The judgment records no substantive determination of the merits and no monetary award. It is therefore a procedural strike-out decision only.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause or causes of action; it states only that the claim was struck out because the claimant did not reply to tribunal letters dated 23 August and 6 September 2019 and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.