Case 2404983/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Lowe v Wm Morrison Supermarkets Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2404983/2022
- Decision date
- 17 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCarthy Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Lowe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant claimed unfair constructive dismissal, alleging a cumulative breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. The alleged matters included treatment after a meeting on 13 May 2021, alleged bullying and gaslighting about his performance, the handling of welfare support while he was on sick leave, and the alleged last straw that his formal complaint had not been progressed within three weeks and that nothing had changed.
The tribunal rejected the claimant's characterisation of the May 2021 meeting and subsequent management conduct. It found the meeting was amicable and reasonable, that feedback about store issues was within reasonable management conduct, that the claimant had received a positive mid-year review, and that the evidence did not support the allegation that he had been bullied or gaslighted. It also found that the welfare process, including support from Mr Marshall and offers of occupational health and other support, was reasonable and did not breach the implied term.
On the alleged last straw, the tribunal found the formal complaint had been acknowledged, the claimant had been told there would be a delay because the investigating manager was on holiday, and three weeks was not a reasonable period in which to expect the complaint to be completed. The tribunal also found that the claimant did not resign in response to the alleged breach, but because he had been offered or expected to receive a new job. It concluded there was no fundamental breach of contract, no dismissal under section 95(1)(c), and dismissed the unfair dismissal claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant described the claim as unfair constructive dismissal. The tribunal found no fundamental breach of contract and therefore no dismissal under section 95(1)(c) ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
14 references- section 95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA
- Baldwin v Brighton & Hove City Council
- Frenkel Topping Limited v King
- London Borough of Waltham Forest v Omilaju
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
- Wright v North Ayrshire Council
- Nottingham County Council v Meikle
- Air Canada v Lee
- Chindove v William Morrison Supermarkets
- W E Cox Toner (International) Ltd v Crook
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.