Case 2405014/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Heather Kirk v Hammonds of Knutsford plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405014/2022
- Decision date
- 30 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Grubb Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Heather Kirk
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Heather Kirk brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Hammonds of Knutsford Plc. The matter was heard by Employment Judge Grubb at Manchester by CVP on 27 January 2023, with Mr Oakes appearing for the claimant and Mr Hammond, the respondent's Managing Director, appearing for the respondent.
The written judgment records that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded. No separate findings of fact, legal reasoning, or remedy calculation are included in the short written record, which notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
On that basis, the only adjudicated claim recorded in the written judgment is unfair dismissal, and it was dismissed. No monetary award or other remedy is stated in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states: 'The complaint of unfair dismissal is not well-founded.' No separate remedy was recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.