Case 2405015/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Morgan Worsley v Northridge Care Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405015/2022
- Decision date
- 28 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Morgan Worsley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Worsley did not attend the hearing on 21 February 2023, and the Tribunal recorded that she had been given written notice of the hearing. The case was heard remotely at Manchester before Employment Judge Robinson sitting alone, with the respondent represented by Ms Vicky Wilden, Director. The only claim identified in the judgment was unlawful deduction of wages.
The Tribunal struck out the unlawful deduction of wages claim on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The judgment states that Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 applied. The Tribunal made no further order, direction or judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 was applied. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.