Case 2405032/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Green v Tim Parry Jonathan Ball Peace Foundation — 2022
- Case reference
- 2405032/2022
- Decision date
- 21 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Green
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Green worked as a cleaner/domestic for the Peace Foundation from 1 October 2002 until she resigned with immediate effect on 28 April 2022. The tribunal accepted that the charity had experienced financial difficulty after the Covid lockdowns and had reduced its security spending from about £90,000 to £40,000 a year. It found that the change to security arrangements affected Miss Green because she had been working 3am to 6am shifts since a 2010 arrangement after maternity leave, but that arrangement had not become a contractual entitlement to staffed security during those hours.
The tribunal found that the respondent met with Miss Green in March 2022 and then repeatedly tried to retain her by offering options, including keeping her existing hours with a key, reverting to her original 6.30am to 9.30am hours, or later a 6am to 8am arrangement. When Miss Green raised safety concerns, the respondent offered a key, lone-worker arrangements, security call-backs, and other measures. The tribunal accepted that redundancy was not the real issue and that there was no contractual obligation to provide a security guard during her early shift. Applying the constructive dismissal authorities it cited, the tribunal held that the respondent's conduct did not amount to a fundamental breach of contract or breach of trust and confidence, so the constructive unfair dismissal claim failed.
On holiday pay, the tribunal preferred the respondent's evidence that the leave year ran from 1 April to 31 March and that the extra birthday day off was discretionary rather than contractual. It accepted that a Barclays payment record showed Miss Green received £71.25 on 18 May 2022 described as holiday pay, which the tribunal found covered the 2.5 days of accrued untaken leave due after her resignation. It therefore found no outstanding holiday pay due.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal alleged on the basis of proposed changes to hours and security arrangements; the tribunal found no fundamental breach and no dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had been paid £71.25 after resignation for accrued untaken leave and that no holiday pay remained outstanding. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- section 95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- Malik v BCCI
- Morrow v Safeway Stores plc
- Croft v Consignia plc
- Berriman v Delabole Slate Ltd
- Derby City Council v Marshall
- Dutton & Clark v Daly
- section 98(4) ERA 1996
- Regulations 13, 13A, 14 and 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.