Case 2405068/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Walsh v R & M Consultancy Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2405068/2022
- Decision date
- 20 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Walsh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment did not determine the merits of the underlying claim. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had not complied with the case management order dated 29 September 2022 and had not actively pursued the response.
Orders were sent to the parties on 20 October 2022 and again to the respondent's new registered office on 14 November 2022, giving the respondent an opportunity to explain why the response should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The respondent did neither.
The tribunal therefore struck out the response. It noted that the respondent would still be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions, but would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment did not decide the substantive claim. It struck out the respondent's response for failure to comply with the case management order dated 29 September 2022 and failure to make representations or request a hearing. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.