Case 2405073/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Lowcock v Perry’s Produce Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405073/2019
- Decision date
- 30 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Lowcock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Liverpool, before Employment Judge Shotter, found that Mr S Lowcock had been dismissed by way of redundancy and that his claim for a statutory redundancy payment was well-founded. The order was for £1,130.40 gross, based on 3 years at £376.80 gross, and the judgment recorded that the claimant was aged 41 at the effective date of termination.
The judgment also dealt with a wrongful dismissal complaint. It noted that the effective date of termination was 30 November 2018, that ACAS Conciliation took place between 21 February and 21 March 2019, and that the claim form was received by the tribunal on 27 April 2019, outside the ordinary 3-month time limit. The tribunal was satisfied that it was not reasonably practicable for the complaint to be presented within that period and that it was presented within such further period as the tribunal considered reasonable.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract and that the wrongful dismissal claim was well-founded. It awarded £996.99 net by way of unpaid notice pay, calculated as 3 x £332.33. The judgment also included the tribunal office notice on interest, stating the relevant decision day as 30 August 2019 and the stipulated rate as 8%, but no separate interest amount was assessed in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal noted the complaint was presented outside the 3-month time limit after the effective date of termination of 30 November 2018, but was satisfied it was not reasonably practicable to present it earlier and that it was presented within a further reasonable period. | Upheld | — | £997 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by way of redundancy and ordered a statutory redundancy payment of £1,130.40 gross, calculated as 3 years x £376.80 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,130 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,127
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.