Case 2405089/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Lund v Monarchy Bars Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2405089/2019
- Decision date
- 27 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Lund
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 30 July 2020, the tribunal gave Miss D Lund an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing explaining why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The extracted judgment does not record any substantive hearing on the merits of the claim.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim.
The judgment is a short procedural decision and does not contain findings on liability, remedy, or any underlying facts beyond the non-pursuit issue.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not specify the substantive claim in the extracted text; the claim type is inferred from the case listing as unfair dismissal. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.