Case 2405120/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Mthimkhulu v Moneyplus Insolvency Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405120/2019
- Decision date
- 18 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Mthimkhulu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 3 September 2019, Employment Judge Franey sitting alone recorded that all complaints pursued in the proceedings were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, except for her complaint of unfair dismissal and her complaint of pregnancy discrimination under section 18 Equality Act 2010 so far as it related to the decision to dismiss her.
The extracted text contains no substantive reasons on liability and no remedy or award. The only outcome recorded is the dismissal of the withdrawn complaints; the unfair dismissal and pregnancy discrimination complaints are specifically preserved from that dismissal in the wording of the judgment sent to the parties on 18 September 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Expressly excepted from the dismissal upon withdrawal; no substantive outcome is recorded in the extracted text. | Other | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Expressly excepted from the dismissal upon withdrawal; the complaint is stated to concern pregnancy discrimination under section 18 Equality Act 2010 insofar as it relates to the decision to dismiss her. | Other | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.