Case 2405126/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Singh v Thornleys Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2405126/2022
- Decision date
- 31 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Singh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Anderson sat alone at Manchester via CVP on 27 October 2022. The Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the Claimant's complaints of failure to pay a statutory redundancy payment and unfair dismissal because the Claimant lacked the two years' continuous employment needed to bring those claims.
Both the redundancy payment claim and the unfair dismissal claim were therefore dismissed. The judgment records that the merits of either complaint were not determined, because the case failed on the employment-length jurisdictional point.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The Tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to consider the complaint because the Claimant lacked the necessary two years of continuous employment required to bring a statutory redundancy payment claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to consider the complaint because the Claimant lacked the necessary two years of continuous employment required to bring an unfair dismissal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.