Case 2405233/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Ellis v 4D Cleaning And Maintenance Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405233/2019
- Decision date
- 11 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Ellis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, the tribunal found that Mr J Ellis was employed by 4D Cleaning And Maintenance Ltd. It held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment to the claimant of £340.66 net.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £408.88 net. On the notice issue, it found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £740.00.
The notice damages were assessed on the basis of the claimant's gross pay for the notice period, with the judgment stating £1,040.00 for two weeks' gross pay less £500 Universal Credit received. The hearing listed for 2 September 2019 was cancelled. The total of the monetary awards recorded in the judgment is £1,489.54.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £341 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment awards £740.00 for notice damages and says this was based on £1,040.00 for two weeks' gross pay less £500 Universal Credit received; the bracketed arithmetic does not match the stated net figure. | Upheld | — | £740 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as failure to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and orders payment of the net sum. | Upheld | — | £409 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,490
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.