Case 2405237/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Craig Seddon v B & N Coaches Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2405237/2020
- Decision date
- 1 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wheat
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Craig Seddon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Wheat sitting alone at Manchester by remote hearing on 29 June 2021. The claimant, Craig Seddon, was self-represented and the respondent was represented by Mr Waijd, described as a manager.
The tribunal recorded that Mr Seddon’s claim that he had been unfairly dismissed by reason of s.101A(1)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996, identified in the judgment as an automatically unfair reason, was not well founded.
The sole claim was therefore dismissed. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, so no separate written reasons were provided in the judgment record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim brought under s.101A(1)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996 as an automatically unfair dismissal claim; the tribunal found it was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.101A(1)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.