Case 2405250/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Y and others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2405250/2019
- Decision date
- 10 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tom Ryan
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented claims alleging discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and disability. In relation to the third respondent, the live issue at this hearing was an allegation of victimisation arising from the grievance letter of 13 February 2019 and the handling of the appeal and grievance process. The third respondent applied to be struck out, arguing that it was an independent external consultant and not an agent of the employer for the purposes of sections 109 and 110 of the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal did not make final findings of fact on the merits. It recorded the background that Mr AM, acting for the third respondent, conducted the appeal and grievance process, produced reports recommending that the dismissal be upheld and the grievance be dismissed, and that the first respondent followed those recommendations. The judge considered the parties' submissions on the meaning of 'agent' and reviewed the Court of Appeal decision in Kemeh v The Ministry of Defence, together with the statutory provisions in sections 109 and 110 Equality Act 2010.
Applying the strike-out threshold of whether the claim had no reasonable prospect of success, the tribunal was not persuaded that the claimant's argument had no reasonable prospect of success, albeit with some hesitation. It therefore refused the third respondent's application to strike out or remove it from the proceedings. No remedy was determined at this stage.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | Preliminary hearing only. The third respondent's application to strike out the claim was refused; the tribunal did not determine the merits of the underlying victimisation allegation. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- Rule 37 ET Rules
- sections 109 and 110 Equality Act 2010
- Kemeh v The Ministry of Defence [2014] EWCA Civ 91
- Yearwood v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2004] ICR 1656
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.