Case 2405362/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Purvis v Aegis Residential Care Homes Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2405362/2020
- Decision date
- 27 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Purvis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Batten found that Aegis Residential Care Homes Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Ms A Purvis's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £689.00.
The judgment also included the standard notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990. It recorded that if the sum is not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day, interest may accrue from 28 August 2020 at the stipulated rate of 8%.
No separate findings on other claims or remedy components are set out in the extracted judgment text, and no split between different heads of award is given.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and was ordered to pay the gross sum of £689.00. | Upheld | — | £689 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £689
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.