Case 2405383/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Patricia Murray v Integrity Pub Management Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405383/2018
- Decision date
- 31 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Patricia Murray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Liverpool on 30 September 2019, Employment Judge Benson found that Mrs Patricia Murray had been unfairly dismissed by Integrity Pub Management Limited. The tribunal ordered a basic award of £956.25 and a compensatory award of £2,696.87. The schedule records that the claimant was aged 67 at dismissal, had five years' continuous service, and had a weekly pay of £127.50; the basic award was calculated as five weeks at 1.5 times weekly pay. The tribunal also noted that the recoupment regulations did not apply.
The compensatory award was broken down in the schedule as £1,657.50 for 13 weeks' loss of earnings, £500 for loss of statutory rights, and £539.37 representing a 25% uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code. The tribunal therefore treated the unfair dismissal remedy as made up of the basic and compensatory components set out in the schedule rather than a single global figure.
In addition, the tribunal found a breach of contract in relation to notice pay and ordered £637.50 net. It also found an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of accrued holiday pay for six days and ordered £191.25 gross. The tribunal further recorded that the respondent had failed to provide itemised pay statements for October and November 2017. No separate award is recorded for the pay-statement point in the written judgment record.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and ordered a basic award of £956.25 and a compensatory award of £2,696.87. The schedule records the basic award on the basis of age 67 at dismissal, weekly pay of £127.50 and five years' continuous service, and the compensatory award as including 13 weeks' loss, £500 loss of statutory rights, and a 25% ACAS uplift. The recoupment regulations did not apply. | Upheld | — | £3,653 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract in relation to notice pay and ordered £637.50 net, stated as five weeks at £127.50. | Upheld | — | £638 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction in respect of accrued holiday pay for six days, and ordered £191.25 gross. | Upheld | — | £191 |
| Other | The tribunal recorded that the respondent failed to give the claimant itemised pay statements for October and November 2017. No separate monetary award is recorded for this point. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,482
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £956
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,697
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.