Case 2405432/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Ms P Morris v Lifeways Paragon Limited Living Ambitions Limited Lifeways Community Care Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2405432/2016
- Decision date
- 19 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms P Morris
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 9 April 2025, the Tribunal gave Ms P Morris an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out because they had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that she failed to make written representations, or failed to make any sufficient written representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims. No substantive findings were made on the underlying issues, and the judgment records no monetary award or other remedy. The decision was approved by Employment Judge Buzzard on 18 June 2025 and sent to the parties on 19 June 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim head(s); it states that 'the claims' in case numbers 2405432/2016 and 2417775/2020 were struck out because they had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.