Case 2405438/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v LMJ Construction Services Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405438/2019
- Decision date
- 20 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the information before Regional Employment Judge Parkin, with no attendance and no response from the respondent. The tribunal dealt with two claims for unlawful deduction from wages against LMJ Construction Services Ltd, one by Mr Williams-Edmonds and one by Mr Keenan.
The tribunal upheld both claims. It found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from Mr Williams-Edmonds' wages in the net sum of £403.00, described as the amount claimed in the claim form, and ordered the respondent to pay that sum. It also found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from Mr Keenan's wages in the net sum of £704.00, calculated by reference to 58⅓ hours at the agreed net rate of £12 per hour, and ordered payment of that sum.
The judgment contains a separate notice about the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 and states the relevant decision day and calculation day for interest purposes, but it does not record any separate interest figure in the operative judgment. The total of the two awards is £1,107.00 net.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the respondent made unlawful deductions from the wages of Mr Williams-Edmonds in the sum of £403.00 net, as claimed in the claim form. The body of the judgment spells the surname as Williams-Edwards in the operative paragraph, but the award amount is clear. | Upheld | — | £403 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the respondent made unlawful deductions from the wages of Mr Keenan in the sum of £704.00 net, based on 58⅓ hours at the agreed rate of £12 per hour net, as stated in his letter dated 20 August 2019. | Upheld | — | £704 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,107
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.