Case 2405445/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Connell v Darwen Windows Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405445/2019
- Decision date
- 29 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sherratt
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Connell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, found that Mr D Connell had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The judgment records that Darwen Windows Limited was ordered to pay damages of £4,920.00.
The extracted judgment text does not record any separate findings on unfair dismissal, discrimination, or unlawful deduction claims, and it does not split the award into separate heads. It also does not state that any additional interest sum was awarded; it only includes the standard post-judgment interest notice setting out the relevant decision day, calculation day, and stipulated rate.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal stated that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £4,920.00. | Upheld | — | £4,920 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,920
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.